Please note, the author intends to publish this article in the near future. All discussion, comments, and criticism will be carefully considered before the writing goes into print. Ideally, the goal is to reach out to the larger community of students and spark insightful, intellectual debate. -kuhlektiv
Here are some numbers:
2.0 - (0.8 + 0.8) = 0.4
2.0
That’s the number of degrees Celsius the earth's average temperature
can be raised in order for life as we know it to
continue. (Read: water and
food in stable supply for SOME nations, inescapable sci-fi-like conditions for
others)
That’s the number of degrees Celsius humans have raised the
average temperature of the earth to date.
0.8
That’s the number of degrees Celsius the earth's average
temperature would continue to rise even if we stopped producing CO2 today.
0.4
That’s the number of degrees Celsius representing the buffer
zone between a planet we might recognize and sci-fi-like conditions. It’s the
difference between imaginable and unimaginable struggles.
2,795 – 565 = 2,230
2,795
That’s the number of gigatons of carbon contained in the
proven coal, oil, and gas reserves of fossil-fuel companies and countries on
the earth. It’s what our parents are planning to burn.
565
That’s the number of gigatons of CO2 humans can
safely emit before the year 2050 and still remain under this 2 degree buffer
zone. That’s our carbon allowance.
2,230
That’s the number of gigatons of carbon by which the proven
supplies exceed the carbon allowance.
80
that's the percent of the world's proven reserves that needs
to be kept locked away in the earth in order for us to avoid exceeding the
carbon allowance and making an unimaginable
world a reality.
And finally…
16
That’s the number of years it will take us to blow through
this carbon allowance at the current rate of emissions growth, 3% per year.
What will you be doing in 16 years? I’ll be 38 and thinking about how to ration
my government allowed supply of fresh water.[1]
[1] McKibben, Bill. "Global Warming's Terrifying New
Math." Rolling Stone, August 2, 2012. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719
(accessed July 19, 2012).
No comments:
Post a Comment