Thursday, August 16, 2012

It's Our World - Now What Can We Do? (Part 3 of 3)


PLEASE NOTE, THE AUTHOR INTENDS TO PUBLISH THIS ARTICLE IN THE NEAR FUTURE. ALL DISCUSSION, COMMENTS, AND CRITICISM WILL BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED BEFORE THE WRITING GOES INTO PRINT. IDEALLY, THE GOAL IS TO REACH OUT TO THE LARGER COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS AND SPARK INSIGHTFUL, INTELLECTUAL DEBATE.                                                                                                                                                                                                       -KUHLEKTIV 

Now,
what can we do?

My dear architecture student, you are in the most powerful position of all! For you see, buildings (the objects of our all-nighters and caffeine addictions) consume nearly three quarters of all electricity produced in the United States! Embarrassingly, 76% of all the coal, oil and gas burned is used simply for the operation of our country’s buildings; globally, this number is even bigger.

The USA is the world's largest producer of CO2 emissions (per capita). In our country, buildings produce nearly half of all CO2 emissions surpassing both the transportation and industry sectors.[1]


We are buried in financial debt and fearful of the day when we emerge from the protective shell of our educational institutions to claw tooth and nail up the walls of our nation's deep economic chasm. Because the building sector touches nearly every industry across all realms of the American economy, it is architecture, which will be the pegs we use to scale the walls of this chasm.

My plea is this: do not ignore the fact that architecture is in crisis, do not forget how it got that way and under whose reign it fell.


 We are the only ones who can fix this meltdown, make no mistake about it. There is no time to waste before we make architecture relevant again. We need to create change TODAY. By designing buildings and cities that utilize renewable resources at every level and by using the sun, wind, water, and soil to our respectful advantage, we will work to mimic the epic machine that is the global ecosystem. This means we will find ways to create closed circuits within our designs in order to construct systems that minimize waste and reduce reliance on foreign inputs including fossil fuels and remotely produced electricity or water. There is little new research for us to do; the techniques for this kind of design are everywhere, we just have to find and disseminate them: in UC San Diego, a microgrid electricity network; in Brazil, the jequitiba tree's pump-less water circulation; in Barcelona, shared bikes as public transportation. We will solve the climate and economic crises together because we are the only ones who have the tools with which to act.

The math is there and the time is NOW.



Where to read more:

Excerpt from The Party’s Over:

Bill McKibben’s call to action:

A program of goals for architecture’s future endorsed by the AIA and many other organizations:


[1] Mazria, Edward . "Architecture 2030: Why?." Architecture 2030. http://architecture2030.org/the_problem/buildings_problem_why (accessed July 21, 2012).

1 comment:

  1. I don't think the solution is that simple. I wish it was- I wish environmental disaster could be averted by teaching architects sustainable habits, but I think the problem is a lot deeper than buildings (and even if it were, a huge percentage of new buildings aren't designed by an architect). I think the problem starts with an ignorance of the consequences of our lifestyles, partnered with a lack of reverence for other forms of life, including the lives of other humans. I think big steps are being taken in teaching our society about the consequences of our rabid consumerism (http://www.radicalcartography.net/ for example), but as far as teaching people a reverence for life... I have know idea. Just some thoughts.

    ReplyDelete